Symbolic Representation
Below, in a very crude representation, you can see why any symbolic representation demands more than mathematical methods allow for.
An elaboration on the following will follow later.
The graphics approximate 4DD functor icons
Field
The emergence of a Field, itself, must be represented
|
Nought
|
(undistinguishables ; Parker Rhodes)
|
|
Point, dot, circle
|
(inversion-extension; Lawrence Edwards)
|
|
Circle, polygon, square, triangle
|
(harmonics; AM Young, W Tiller)
|
|
\_/
|
(boundary=:=field; O#o)
|
Boundary
The properties of a boundary need to be described in its opening/closing dynamics.
|
|
|
(distinction; Spencer-Brown)
|
|
||
|
(extension; Varela)
|
|
-|
|
(hyperincursion; Dubois)
|
|
-<
|
(meta-fractal; Vrobel)
|
Interface
In the boundary, the processes of the surrounding fields interact and combine.
|
■
|
(separator; closed system - hell)
|
|
X
|
(filter; semi-closed system - purgatory)
|
|
≡
|
(identifier; semi-open system - paradise)
|
|
....
|
(connector; open system - heaven)
|
Gate
The dynamics within the boundary determine the filter characteristics of the interface; based on the same principles as operate in the emergence of a Field.
|
=
|
(equator; replicator)
|
|
*/
|
(splitter; redefiner)
|
|
_|_
|
(identifier; semi-open system)
|
|
-
|
(denier; invertor)
|
What is needed is a description of our own use of freedom of choice.
In this formulation we will find also the logic of Creation.
Whatever we perceive of the universe is based on our own realisation.
We thus need to define a symbol system for our own realisation.
To be continued ...
Next: From Physics to Phasics
|
