Four Levels of Formulation
 Four Levels of FormulationOtto van Nieuwenhuijze Scientific description can be understood as four (interrelated) level of observation, with each their own mode of involvement. physical electric kundalini semantic These four levels can be represented as a wave; together they recapitulate the same essence as each of them reflects. The [1D] physical and [2D] electrical component                                  ______________                                 |                      |                                 |                      |                                 |                      |    ----------------------------------------------->  /                            / /                            //_________________/ Superimposed with the [3D] Kundalini and [4D] Semantic component:                                      _______________                                    /                        /                                   /                        /                                  /                        /    -------------------------------------------------->    |                             |    |                             |    |_________________ | The Semantic Structure has the quality of a Web; a network; 4D.The Kundalini Element has the properties of a Circuit; a wave train; 3DThe Electromagnetic Component has the appearance of a chain, 2D.The Physical Aspect uses a particular, nodular, formulation, 1D. Electromagnetic is 2D, because defined along a line.Kundalini is 3D, because each of the waves ‘self-seeks’ restoration of balance in the context, and thereby creates continuity in context. The Einstein Model equates Gravity with Inertia with Mass with Energy.In that - particular, physical - model it cannot be seen how gravity (coherence) is the consequence of:“excursion, incursion, recursion, hyperincursion”. Even though the Relativistic model is defined on basis of the ‘Light Line’, the EM wave i.e. a line of light, it does not base itself on the properties of ‘braiding’ of the EM ‘line’. The relationship between the wave (v) and the wave envelope (V(c)) is not regarded for the envelope, but for the wave node. The Probabilistic approach relates the wave to the next wave in the wave train; it thereby realises that the wave node is determined by the balance with respect to the wave front before, and after, it. This is represented as the juxtaposed levels of atomic orbits. Even though the Planck Quantum model is based on the Harmonic of the Schrödinger Equation, the inherent organisation of scaled harmonics is not considered. As a result, the precisioning of the transition point can not be understood as related to the dynamics and harmonics in the ‘rest of the system’. The Kundalini model is based on those harmonics: the resonance in each node is understood to be related to the resonance stability (Singularity stability) in each of the other nodes of the system. In the Kundalini Concept it is clear that the system as a whole has a resonant stability; yet the whole system if determined by the ongoing interactive dynamic interfacing with/in the context. The Chackra (Zero-transition points, Meridian (loop integral for the ‘light cone connections’), Aura (Soliton wave field, composite of all sub harmonics) are understood to be one integral system. The Semantic Web is based on our use of ‘external’ reference (language) to address ‘internal’ events (realisations). We refer to phenomena to address noumena. This means that languaging is, by definition, an Inversion Construct: it portrays ar outside us (reality) what is processed within us (reality). The Semantic Web (the Construct of Language) is based on our connection to the environment via the Kundaliny operator, which entrains with the Electromagnetic Functor in our body-system, which is manifested as the Physical particul’arity of our body.
 [Welcome] [Core Concepts] [Topics] [Participants] [Publications] [Research] [Projects]